User talk:2600:6C40:200:1C2C:1972:F610:9C5F:2A94

February 2019
Hello, I'm ESkog. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Schenck v. United States— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. (ESkog)(Talk) 03:52, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Schenck v. United States. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 03:54, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Schenck v. United States, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. 94rain Talk 04:20, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.