User talk:2600:6C44:4B7F:5900:44E1:6E5C:E16C:362A

June 2024
Hello, I'm Wiiformii. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Jessie Vetter, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Wiiformii (talk) 14:43, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did with this edit to Pat Sajak. Thank you. MacAddct1984 (talk &#124; contribs) 15:10, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wars of the Roses. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. MacAddct1984 (talk &#124; contribs) 15:20, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Romulus Augustulus shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. NebY (talk) 19:10, 16 June 2024 (UTC)