User talk:2600:6C4E:57F:541E:5A9:CFC:4D86:E88C

AJ vs. Fury
I agree that AJ will more than likely be the A-side and receive first dibs, and the article should have stayed as AJ vs. Fury, however, the unnecessary name change hasn't breached any policies and doesn't contradict any guidelines (as far as I'm aware). The only reason I've reverted you is solely due to the current title of the article, which should match the lead and infobox. You've both breached WP:3RR, so there's a possibility you both might receive a short block if an administrator sees what is occurring. Just leave it as is for now. An announcement will happen within the next two weeks, so the article can (if necessary, and I'm betting it will) be moved back to its original state. Cheers. – 2 . O . Boxing  21:43, 15 May 2021 (UTC)