User talk:2600:6C50:607F:2FAB:918D:5907:EEED:1AF9

Welcome!
Hi 2600:6C50:607F:2FAB:918D:5907:EEED:1AF9! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! -- Toddy1 (talk) 07:35, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

March 2024
Hello, I'm Toddy1. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Gautam Adani have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective.

In addition the content you added to the article on Gautam Adani did not include a citation to a reliable source. Information on Wikipedia needs to be supported by citations to reliable sources to comply with our policy of verification. Please have a look at referencing for beginners.

Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 07:35, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Gautam Adani. Thank you. Schrödinger's jellyfish &#9993; 07:38, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Gautam Adani. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- Toddy1 (talk) 07:44, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.