User talk:2600:6C52:6D80:399E:5045:4799:D6CA:24D7

May 2020
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  Acroterion   (talk)   13:46, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Most terms other than this one, in reference to affirmative action objection are citeable as misnomers
This is a word used in scholarly articles referencing people accusing others of "reverse racism" quite frequently, but since it covers origins of terms passing on misnomership, if you read the wikipedia linked in the edit, or other sources on "misnomer". Race itself is a misnomer stated in them. 10.1080/23323256.2007.11499942 Coertze, R. D. (2007). “Racism and ethnicity”: Reflections on the debatable permanence of terminology. Anthropology Southern Africa, 30(1-2), 11–19.

"The concept of social race and its derivation racism are both considered to be misnomers in defining social groups and as indications of discriminatory behaviour."

It is by no stretch of the imagination, you needn't use imagination, to call the term a misnomer. People misunderstood Racism so utterly, that they thought they could call it reversed in courts and political settings. why would it need to be overly cited as someone directly referring it as such. This is wikipedia, where we write objectively, and not a quotebook. I can log in to my account if it helps, and if you'd like to assist in doing it correctly please do. It isn't vandalism, people deserve to see the misconstrued root of the term. This also explains why its still used properly in the grammatically incorrect state.