User talk:2600:6C64:78F0:8120:C1E8:3F75:5FD:26D

November 2023
Hello, I'm TechnoSquirrel69. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Saint Nicholas seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''There are multiple reliable sources which refer to it as a cult, which is why the article reports it that way. Please start a discussion in the talk page if you think this should be changed. Thanks!'' —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 05:07, 25 November 2023 (UTC)


 * How is calling it a following non neutral, yet calling it a cult considered neutral? Cult carries a negative connotation to it, following is neutral. Care to elaborate on your thinking behind this? 2600:6C64:78F0:8120:C1E8:3F75:5FD:26D (talk) 05:33, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Hey there, let me elaborate in saying that the neutral point of view policy does allow for the presentation of a "non-neutral" standpoint if that is the established consensus among reliable sources. Wikipedia should not aim to create a false balance with minority perspectives: if most scholars call it a cult, then it's a cult. Again, feel free to open a discussion on the article's talk page if you feel like this is an incorrect assessment of the sources or is otherwise problematic in relation to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 06:14, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult#:~:text=In%20the%20English-speaking%20world,with%20differing%20doctrines%20or%20practices.
 * This is on your own website. Cult is a pejorative term, and referring to someone who carries reverence within the church as having a "cult" isn't neutral, it is a character judgement. 2600:6C64:78F0:8120:C1E8:3F75:5FD:26D (talk) 05:40, 25 November 2023 (UTC)