User talk:2600:6C64:797F:1720:406F:B105:39FE:F167

July 2022
Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with your edit to Criticism of The Da Vinci Code, as we really appreciate your participation. However, the edit had to be partially reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept uncited material. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here.

Although the information about Jack Dunn's lawsuit does appear further down in the article body, where it is accompanied by a citation of a reliable source, that citation makes no mention of any "suspicious circumstances" under which the lawsuit was dismissed. In fact, that passage explicitly gives the reason given by Judge Michael Ponsor for dismissing the case, in the form of a direct quote by him: "No prior case recognizing a theory of copyright infringement based on the sort of thematic or structural similarity posited by the plaintiff has been offered in his memorandum opposing summary judgment, nor has the court found one."

If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 17:32, 12 July 2022 (UTC)