User talk:2600:8800:4021:DE00:80F7:9F14:7472:1231

April 2024
Hello, I'm TechnoSquirrel69. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Atlas Shrugged—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 02:01, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Atlas Shrugged. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 03:22, 2 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Rational selfishness is a direct attempt to justify selfishness, thus it is a very constructive edit, and please stop taking it down. 2600:8800:4021:DE00:80F7:9F14:7472:1231 (talk) 03:25, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Atlas Shrugged shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. RL0919 (talk) 03:45, 2 April 2024 (UTC)


 * RL0919....  How is rational selfishness not a justification of selfishness?  You keep deleting a fact that atlas shrugged is a text designed to justify selfishness as a virtue.  A critical point that should be pointed out in a wikipedia page.   Why do you keep deleting this fact?  Please stop. 2600:8800:4021:DE00:80F7:9F14:7472:1231 (talk) 03:48, 2 April 2024 (UTC)


 * You are inserting your own personal interpretation that is not cited to any sources or otherwise discussed in the article. I explained this on the article's Talk page at Talk:Atlas Shrugged, but you choose to ignore the discussion and keep inserting your preferred text. This is classic edit warring. --RL0919 (talk) 03:52, 2 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Define rational selfishness while proving it is not a justification of selfishness. This is not a personal interpretation, this is a fact that deserves to be kept on wikipedia and the description of this book. 2600:8800:4021:DE00:80F7:9F14:7472:1231 (talk) 03:57, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
 * https://www.atlassociety.org/post/virtue-of-selfishness 2600:8800:4021:DE00:80F7:9F14:7472:1231 (talk) 04:01, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
 * You are specifically adding comments to a sentence about the novel's influence on political figures. That requires sources to support that specific claim about its political influence. And regardless of your arguments, repeatedly re-inserting your preferred text is edit warring. If you haven't followed the link to that term, you should, because it explains how you will be blocked if you continue. --RL0919 (talk) 04:05, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I added links that show what I have posted is not my opinion, but an accepted analysis of the source material. I hope this satisfies your editorial review.  Thanks... 2600:8800:4021:DE00:80F7:9F14:7472:1231 (talk) 04:16, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I have repeatedly advised you to discuss this before continuing to re-insert your desired text, and you just keep re-inserting. Adding a couple of blog post links to the latest re-insertion is not a discussion. --RL0919 (talk) 04:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. RL0919 (talk) 04:24, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

April 2024
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as done at Atlas Shrugged. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 04:38, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.