User talk:2600:8800:5C0B:A400:8159:F6FC:C8FA:AAA8

February 2024
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Gemini (chatbot). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. popo dameron  ⁠ talk 04:19, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Gemini (chatbot), you may be blocked from editing. – Gluonz  talk contribs 20:43, 23 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Dear Thing, I wrote the following: "In February 2024, Gemini was generating images that featured inappropriate racial and gender diversity in historically inaccurate contexts, portraying historical Caucasian people such as America's Founding Fathers, the Pope, Medieval European Kings & Queens, Vikings and even Nazi Soldiers as Black while refusing prompts to generateany images of White people. Many conservatives in the U.S. & other countries published these reports online,including images on video platforms such as YouTube," the original stated " 2600:8800:5C0B:A400:8159:F6FC:C8FA:AAA8 (talk) 21:05, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Discuss the changes you want to make. – Gluonz  talk contribs 21:08, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Dear Thing, The original stated that: "In February 2024, users reported that Gemini was generating images that featured racial and gender diversity in historically inaccurate contexts, primarily among White people such as Vikings and Nazi soldiers, and refusing prompts to generate images of White people. Many people promoted these reports online, citing them as evidence of Google's "wokeness".
 * These statements are clearly soft-pedaled versions of reality. "users reported"? No, users actually found that... "featured racial and gender diversity in historically inaccurate contexts..." False again! It was not "racial diversity", White people exist too but the ChatBot refused to produce any images of White people & replaced historical Caucasian people with Blacks & members of other races. This is absolute, attempts to generate images of White people instead produced a mini-lecture on "racism" by the ChatBot. This has been proven in multiple videos posted online by users. "primarily among White people such as Vikings and Nazi soldiers" False again! It wasn't "primarily among Vikings & Nazi Soldiers" (gosh, why'd the author pick just those examples?) it was Medieval Kings, Founding Fathers of the USA, the Pope & more. This is easily verified. Care to look at some videos? I'll send you links or you can find them yourself & leave your bubble.
 * Here is my version, "In February 2024, Gemini was generating images that featured inappropriate racial and gender diversity in historically inaccurate contexts, portraying historical Caucasian people such as America's Founding Fathers, the Pope, Medieval European Kings & Queens, Vikings and even Nazi Soldiers as Black while refusing prompts to generate any images of White people. Many conservatives in the U.S. & other countries published these reports online, including images on video platforms such as YouTube, citing them as evidence of Google's "wokeness" ...
 * See how my version is an accurate portal of the situation? Oh, I could have said more, for the end of the article states, "In response, Krawczyk said that Google was "working to improve these kinds of depictions immediately", and Google paused Gemini's ability to generate images of people." This portrays Google & Krawczyk as being some puzzled but honest guys who are going to jump on this funny glitch that somehow appeared. Krawczyk has been published attacks upon "White privilege" for a long time now and this whole sorry episode is due to him and his political beliefs.
 * I have reported facts & I can prove it. I painted a quite neutral point of view, but stated easily verifiable FACTS. But you people don't want the populace to read about facts; you them to see the Leftist point-of-view, no matter how inaccurate it is. You are also greasy, power-hungry little totalitarians filled with hate. Fortunately, your time is running out. 2600:8800:5C0B:A400:8159:F6FC:C8FA:AAA8 (talk) 21:37, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Not here; try putting your rationale in the most recent section of Talk:Gemini (chatbot) (though I would heavily suggest that you revise it, as some parts of that are unlikely to fare well there). – Gluonz  talk contribs 21:41, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article. – Gluonz  talk contribs 21:03, 23 February 2024 (UTC)


 * It is you who has the non-neutral point of view; I kicked your smelly behind in a reply above. 2600:8800:5C0B:A400:8159:F6FC:C8FA:AAA8 (talk) 21:40, 23 February 2024 (UTC)