User talk:2600:8800:8B80:9B8:537E:B7DE:1628:8456

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Marcia Wilbur, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * How to write a great article
 * The perfect article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Comagfr (talk) 23:12, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Marcia Wilbur


The article Marcia Wilbur has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: '''Out of the listed references:


 * [2], [8], [13], [15], [16], [17] do not mention the person in the article at all


 * [1], [5], [7], [9], [14], [18] are primary sources by the person in the article and they don't appear to be notable (WP:BASIC, WP:BLPSELFPUB)


 * [3], [4], [6], [10] are about two books that the person in the article wrote about a legal subject. No secondary sources can be found that mention them (WP:PRIMARY, WP:USEBYOTHERS) and the author does not appear to have a law degree (WP:BOOKCRIT, WP:PROMOTION)


 * [11] is about an open-source project supposed to be lead by the person in the article. The website does not work, the Github repository has been emptied, the Gitlab repository has 27 commits, of which none seem to be about coding (only small documentation changes), last updated more than a year ago. The person in the article appears as the author of 2 commits only. (WP:INHERENTWEB)

About the article:
 * Almost all of it appears to be a collection of unimportant, non-notable information about the person in the article (WP:INDISCRIMINATE)
 * It is about a living person and lists personal details without sources, both at the infobox and the article itself (WP:BLPREMOVE, WP:VERIFY)

About the person listed in the article:
 * I believe that "No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability" (WP:OVERCOME) and the article of the subject is not worth an article in Wikipedia.'''

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Nomination of Marcia Wilbur for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marcia Wilbur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Marcia Wilbur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Comagfr (talk) 23:27, 30 October 2020 (UTC)