User talk:2600:8801:1C9C:D000:A078:2ED0:6EF:A55E

November 2023
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Mark St. John, you may be blocked from editing. 156.57.11.183 (talk) 13:35, 14 November 2023 (UTC)


 * I don't see where I am in the wrong here, or what sort of "explanation" is needed, pal. No one will get off their butts and answer the message I inserted, but clearly you cannot read - this "source" is unencyclopedic because it is a satirical video (clearly marked as such at both the start and end, as well as in the description). No person out there exists by the name of "Shlomo Grant" (clearly spliced together, much like the photographer named "Johnny Lust" also mentioned therein), those songs "mentioned" do not correlate to Mark's time in the band (they are from the early days of Paul and Gene's partnership), nor does him "watching" The Wizard of Oz add up, as that too is spliced. The bits about Mark "not remembering" the group and also on his death are also falsely strung together, as he passed in April of 2007 rather than in 2008, while the bit about Gene simply laughing off the news is also falsely spliced and could be considered slanderous if one did not realize it was just a joke. Pull your head out of your rear-end and accept the fact that this source is not of appropriate use for an encyclopedic site that is meant to be factual and not read like an Encyclopaedia Dramatica article. 2600:8801:1C9C:D000:79F2:ED9F:14FE:3EF9 (talk) 23:51, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Just so you know, no one is going to respond to "messages" left in edit summaries, that's not how this works. And I wouldn't expect many editors to line up to engage with you given your apparent predisposition for incivility. I know little about the article you're complaining about, but the material in question appears to be properly sourced. I'd say your best bet is to bring some proof that the material is inaccurate. Is that a possibility? Something more than an irate opinion would be needed. 156.57.11.183 (talk) 06:00, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Listen closely to the audio and you will hear that it is spliced together at the expense of creating a false narrative against an already troubled individual. At the expense of my replies continuing to read in a manner bordering on “incivility”, I will leave it at that. As someone who is a lifelong Kiss fan I know that the egos of Paul and Gene can be driven to extreme lengths sometimes, but for either man to go as low as claiming to have laughed off the death of a former bandmate is a bridge too far. 205.174.28.158 (talk) 15:47, 16 November 2023 (UTC)