User talk:2600:8801:CA05:EF00:D41E:2828:7AA7:A58D

Welcome!
Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 14:31, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Your behavior concerning Olúfẹ́mi O. Táíwò wasn't very kosher. Liliana UwU  (talk / contributions) 01:07, 22 May 2023 (UTC)


 * So we are re-hashing from yesterday on something that is over. I could place the exact same thing on your page (if it wasn’t protected) for personal attacks by saying I acted in bad faith numerous times and did you also post this on the other pages of the people involved for personally attacking me? I’d be super surprised if you did. Please leave me alone. This is bordering harassment now as I have moved on and this was absolutely unnecessary. 2600:8801:CA05:EF00:D41E:2828:7AA7:A58D (talk) 16:13, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * @LilianaUwU and directly to a level 2 warning! How nice of you. 2600:8801:CA05:EF00:D41E:2828:7AA7:A58D (talk) 16:15, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I posted that before the ANI thread. Can we forget about this?  Liliana UwU  (talk / contribs) 19:36, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
 * @LilianaUwU Done 2600:8801:CA05:EF00:5412:4309:BBCF:A3AF (talk) 20:04, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Thoughts
@LilianaUwU hey what are your thoughts on this Canopy Innovations. I posted on Help desk but no response so far but you can see my comments there. 2600:8801:CA05:EF00:5412:4309:BBCF:A3AF (talk) 21:34, 23 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Hmm... not sure if I can really give an opinion about that, but it's certainly sus enough that I'll keep it on my watchlist for the time being.  Liliana UwU  (talk / contribs) 23:52, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
 * @LilianaUwU Yeah was hard for me too. My concern is the refs do not point to much about this place except to their own website for the most part and some of the journals it points to have nothing to do with this company as they are generalized studies. Just the first page of Google has nothing that I consider a source valid enough for the article. 2600:8801:CA05:EF00:D41E:2828:7AA7:A58D (talk) 23:55, 23 May 2023 (UTC)