User talk:2600:8803:FF08:100:A926:D283:3FAD:BDA6

Re:PJ Media
There is consensus among Wikipedia editors that MBFC is generally unreliable: please see its entry at Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources. Please also see WP:NPOV. Cheers, gnu 57 22:21, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Yet Wikipedia promotes PJ Media as being a reliable site? Is it not biased when a Wikipedia Editor making edits to this site is also an employee of PJ Media. Wikipedia Editor Chasrmartin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Chasrmartin is Charles Martin, Science, Health, Culture and Technology Writer for PJ Media https://pjmedia.com/columnist/charlie-martin/. Could it be possible that PJMedia may be persuading their writer Mr Martin to remove any negative edits, or perhaps he could be doing it on his own. Mr Martin has made numerous edits to this page, his last entry on Nov 15, 2019. Perhaps this bias among Wikipedia editors should be exposed and brought up to a higher level? What is your opinion?