User talk:2600:8804:6600:C4:9DD6:8ED8:6B65:A506

October 2021
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The thread is named 2600:8804:6600:C4:9DD6:8ED8:6B65:A506's talk page. — Shibboleth ink  (♔ ♕) 21:40, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for block evasion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Liz Read! Talk! 22:27, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.


 * The IP is basically telling they're going to continue their harassment after the block expires... Mind giving them an extension? RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 23:14, 4 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Yes yes, spank me daddy 2600:8804:6600:C4:9DD6:8ED8:6B65:A506 (talk) 23:38, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

@RandomCanadian and @Shibbolethink, you guys might want to go over to the french wikipedia and force your will over them. People are talking about DARPA(!!) on Peter's page. https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Daszak 2600:8804:6600:C4:9DD6:8ED8:6B65:A506 (talk) 23:40, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Bien merci d'avoir fait part du problème, c'est maintenant réglé. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 00:14, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Here, a free source to cite for you and your new friends https://ici.tou.tv/decouverte/S34E04 2600:8804:6600:C4:9DD6:8ED8:6B65:A506 (talk) 03:24, 5 October 2021 (UTC)


 * 2600:8804:6600:C4:9DD6:8ED8:6B65:A506,
 * You have to stop attacking other editors or an admin less tolerant than me will block your whole IP range for a long period of time. If you return from this short block and continue to insult and malign other editors, that will be the end of your editing career on Wikipedia. You have been warned.
 * You are free to dissent and disagree with other editors but you can not cast aspersions and speculate on other editor's motives. That civility rule goes for everyone, long-time editors as well as IP editors. Liz Read! Talk! 00:28, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Shibbolethink has literally published a piece titled "CoVID-19 did not come from the Wuhan Institute of Virology: A discussion about theories of origin with your friendly neighborhood virologist." Does that sound like someone that wants to have a rational discussion? His actions on the lab leak page match this bias. 2600:8804:6600:C4:9DD6:8ED8:6B65:A506 (talk) 02:20, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
 * He hasn't pushed for it to be included as a reliable source, has he? Unlike all people who have pushed for the Drastic website... RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 02:50, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Did I stutter? 2600:8804:6600:C4:9DD6:8ED8:6B65:A506 (talk) 03:23, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

which appears to correspond to that of the scientific community, what Wikipedia must represent, via reliable sources. There's no point in personalizing this and pushing conspiracy theories about other editors, please see WP:FOC... — Paleo Neonate  – 22:53, 7 October 2021 (UTC)