User talk:2600:8805:3E15:5900:4EB8:D79A:F2FD:9920

March 2024
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Cuban Revolution. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Wham2001 (talk) 20:58, 23 March 2024 (UTC)


 * A neutral view point would be explaining the fallout that Cuba has gone through since the revolution. What wikipedia has is biased and not neutral. 👍 2600:8805:3E15:5900:4EB8:D79A:F2FD:9920 (talk) 21:03, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
 * See my comment below. You could add an analysis of the effects of the revolution to the article, but it needs to be sourced to reliable sources and reflect the balance of academic opinion on the topics, not just your own opinions.  This would be quite tricky to do properly, because feelings about the matter still run strongly, but would be an improvement to the article.  Simply adding your own polemic opinions in without sourcing is not of any use to readers and is likely to lead to you being blocked from editing.  Best, Wham2001 (talk) 21:06, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Cuban Revolution, you may be blocked from editing. Any analysis of the effects of the revolution that you wish to add into the article needs to be supported by references to reliable sources. Wham2001 (talk) 21:03, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Cuban Revolution. Scribbie (talk) 21:07, 23 March 2024 (UTC)