User talk:2600:8806:2001:A800:84BB:6C93:8751:3EC

Inconsistency with Rylands Fragment
The text and footnote 16 apparently supports a 3rd or 4th century date for the Rylands fragment, where as later in the post 3 footnotes (33-35) appear to support an early 2nd century date (125AD). Could this be resolved or at least further discussed if it is not resolved? It is not consistent. Dgs150 (talk) 04:29, 14 April 2021 (UTC)