User talk:2600:8807:4080:10C:C0D2:5438:5ED7:CD4C

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to University of Holy Cross. Thank you. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 07:03, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

I'm not going to get into an editing war. But this is why academics such as myself warn students not to use Wikipedia as a source in any research -- and if they do, it costs them grading points. The intent of "reliable sources" is fine, but a newspaper article, for example, does not trump an eye-witness with primary, documentary evidence. And so Wikipedia continues to set the bar for informational mediocrity.

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Talk:University of Holy Cross. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 17:23, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Academics like yourself should be glad that Wikipedia doesn't allow people to edit articles to insert their own biased point of view, especially when they have a conflict of interest with regards to the subject matter. ST47 (talk) 17:30, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
 * There's simply no way that your self-published press release, or your google drive link to a "petition", is going to be considered reliable sourcing. They are primary sources and not verifiable. WP:NOR. ST47 (talk) 17:32, 4 July 2019 (UTC)