User talk:2601:147:8300:EFD0:ACDE:8423:2EB5:F8F9

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the ones you made to User talk:JesseRafe. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply  [ create a named account] . It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages and rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (2601:147:8300:EFD0:ACDE:8423:2EB5:F8F9) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;).

Happy editing! JesseRafe (talk) 13:45, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at National Institute of Standards and Technology, you may be blocked from editing. JesseRafe (talk) 21:28, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

None of my edits can be called as "disruptive editing", because all the edits are factually correct and appropriate sources/citations have been provided (and none are based on my analyses ). Instead of just stating vague statements, try to be provide precise comments, i.e. exactly which statement(s) you find "disruptive". I can argue that perhaps you have limited knowledge on the topics related to the edits and hence fail to understand the edits. If you had anything to say, you could have commented on the NIST talk page where I had suggested the edits much before I made the actual changes. So, understand your limitations, and act accordingly. Any constructive criticism is welcome. Any further comments you have can be posted on the talk page, and if your arguments are found to be appropriate I'll take those into account sincerely and accordingly change my edits, otherwise I'll move forward with edits which I find to be accurate.2601:147:8300:EFD0:ACDE:8423:2EB5:F8F9 (talk) 23:31, 12 January 2018 (UTC)