User talk:2601:14A:C100:1B80:44C3:4E4C:793:BCAD

April 2021
Hello, I'm Lettherebedarklight. I noticed that you recently removed content from Richard David Semba without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. h 14:27, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, 2601:14A:C100:1B80:44C3:4E4C:793:BCAD. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Richard David Semba, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. ''Kind regards. —Twotwofourtysix(My talk page and contributions)'' 14:28, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Richard David Semba. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:47, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Richard David Semba was changed by 2601:14A:C100:1B80:44C3:4E4C:793:BCAD (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.926178 on 2021-04-12T15:47:07+00:00

Edit war
Hello. I've noticed that there has been an edit war going on at Richard David Semba. There is a policy at Wikipedia called the 3-Revert Rule which states that you should not perform more than 3 reverts in a period of 24 hours, and that edit wars are prohibited. You have already performed two reverts on the page "Richard David Semba".

This is a warning that you should not perform too many reverts and that you should not edit war.

I have also noticed that you have been removing content without a good explanation (out of date, etc.) It does not appear out-of-date to me, nor do I see any other problems. If you think I made a mistake, reply to this comment, and I will consider it. Thingy-1234 (talk &#124; contribs) 15:57, 12 April 2021 (UTC)