User talk:2601:14D:8000:3D45:B8B5:D24E:BFAD:A11A

Meters (talk) 20:00, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 9/11 Truth movement. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jeb3 Talk at me here What I've Done 19:45, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Meters. I noticed that you made a comment on the page 9/11 Truth movement that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Take it to the talk page. This has been undone by more than one editor. Per WP:BRD it is up to you to discuss this material on the talk page and attempt to get consensus rather than continuing to restore it. Using multiple IPs is not going to help. Despite your claim that no reason was given, the edit summary clearly challenged the reliability of the source. Calling user:Slatersteven a "probable propagandist " is personal attack. '' Meters (talk) 19:48, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at 9/11 Truth movement shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Meters (talk) 19:52, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please read wp:editwar, also wp:npa.Slatersteven (talk) 19:59, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Also read wp:rs and wp:fringe.Slatersteven (talk) 20:02, 4 November 2019 (UTC)