User talk:2601:182:4300:88C0:E4D7:8A90:4236:EE2E

So, I hit enter too soon and didn't finish explaining why this update looks gigantic but isn't really. Most of it is 1987 Study 1) Cited the 1993 follow-up there. 2) Added the title of the Surgeon General's report as it is highly relevant that the report was not focused on the same population as the study was. 3) It now accurately reflects what was actually in the SG's report about this study. The citation includes the page number if you would like to look. 4) I added more specificity about EIBI skepticism. Clarity should probably be more important than conciseness in this case. So, yes, it looks like a lot of new information. It is really mostly just adding what should've already been there. 2601:182:4300:88C0:E4D7:8A90:4236:EE2E (talk) 15:44, 18 November 2020 (UTC)