User talk:2601:183:867F:957B:28F8:6122:F8B2:52E5

Suggested corrections of subjective content in the article titled "Big lie"
1) Change heading "Trump's false claim of a stolen election" to "Trump's claim of a stolen election" - the article provides no proof that Trump's claims were false. stating so is a matter of opinion rather than a matter of fact. 2) Change "President Donald Trump and his allies repeatedly and falsely claimed there had been massive election fraud and that Trump had really won the election" to "President Donald Trump and his allies repeatedly claimed there had been massive election fraud and that Trump had really won the election" - the article provides no proof that Trump's claims were false. stating so is a matter of opinion rather than a matter of fact. 3) Change "By May 2021, the Republican party had come to embrace the false narrative and use it as justification to impose new voting restrictions in its favor" to "By May 2021, the Republican party had come to embrace the narrative and use it as justification to impose new voting regulations to address perceived election problems" - the article provides no proof that the narrative was false. stating so is a matter of opinion rather than a matter of fact. The article also provides no proof that Republicans wanted to restrict voting, and all Republican support for the new regulations was described to address voting fraud. Stating that Republicans proposed voting regulations were intended to favor republicans is a matter of opinion rather than a matter of fact. 4) Change "In winter 2021, The New York Times examined Trumps promotion ..." to "In winter 2021, The New York Times - which has a long history of anti-Trump sentiment and reporting - examined Trumps promotion ...". There is no dispute that the NYT is decidedly liberal and anti-Trump - adding this qualifier will add some credibility and perspective to the article.