User talk:2601:188:180:1481:2C:5F1F:6A04:8E55

February 2019
Hello, I'm Oshwah. An edit you recently made to East Boston seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   20:42, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * , please take another look. Thank you from Bob, 2601:188:180:1481:2C:5F1F:6A04:8E55 (talk) 20:43, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Btw, I wash my hands of that article. Perhaps you can assist the new user there. 2601:188:180:1481:2C:5F1F:6A04:8E55 (talk) 20:44, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Crap! Sorry Bob! I saw this edit and thought maybe it was a test? I didn't notice your previous changes which appear to be just fine. I'll restore those changes.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   20:55, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
 * My bad on that edit--I tried for a less 'explosive' word and gummed things up. Cheers, 2601:188:180:1481:2C:5F1F:6A04:8E55 (talk) 20:59, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
 * No problem. To be fair, I gummed up the revert by also reverting the previous edits you made and not just that one... :-)  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   22:06, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Waheed Zafar Qasmi
, since I can no longer access the article, and had intended to revert the sock's latest edits, I'll make two requests: can you or another registered account revert the unsourced content, and perhaps block the disruptive account, too? Thank you. I'm heading out on business for a few days. Cheers, 2601:188:180:1481:156F:81B:FD85:2BB1 (talk) 20:08, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I protected so I don't want to revert. Maybe will? TonyBallioni (talk) 20:12, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Well, Ponyo stole my edit right out of my mouth. Oh well. — k6ka  🍁 ( Talk ·  Contributions ) 20:15, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you, all! 2601:188:180:1481:156F:81B:FD85:2BB1 (talk) 20:23, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
 * It was noted in the discussion I started yesterday at ANI that looks a lot like a block evasion of . Even without that, is there any reason they're not blocked? 2601:188:180:1481:156F:81B:FD85:2BB1 (talk) 20:55, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
 * , I just filed a SPI on your behalf. However, it does not seem that and  are related exactly. They made conflicting edits. &#8213; Matthew J. Long  -Talk-☖  22:14, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you,, but is the alternate of .  was an evasion of . Altogether, both editors, using multiple accounts, were disrupting related articles about members of the same family. 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 18:44, 12 February 2019 (UTC)