User talk:2601:188:180:B8E0:6C57:2675:7756:B1CF

Two vandals, likely WP:LTAs
, or, would appreciate blocks, page protection, etc. Thanks, 2601:188:180:B8E0:6C57:2675:7756:B1CF (talk) 01:39, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Resolved by . 2601:188:180:B8E0:6C57:2675:7756:B1CF (talk) 01:52, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Just because a user is blocked doesn't mean all his her edits are bad. If you think so, then you should re read the Wikipedia rules. Thank you and have a nice day. LOREN 333 666 999 (talk) 00:59, 19 October 2019 (UTC)


 * , this is 2601 away from home—per the comment above and recent edits, is it possible that LOREN is evading a block? Thank you. 24.2.193.216 (talk) 01:29, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
 * It's possible, but it's also possible that User:35.141.137.229 was multiple different people and some edits were good, others were vandalism, or that LOREN 333 666 999 is unrelated. I warned them for their personal attacks in several of their edit summaries, but their reverts seem to be fine otherwise. ST47 (talk) 01:35, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Okay, then maybe you can explain both the edit and the summary here . To my ear, the summary alone quacks like the blocked IP. If not, it’s still unacceptable. Thanks, . 24.2.193.216 (talk) 01:57, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Well, you were right. ST47 (talk) 22:58, 19 October 2019 (UTC)


 * , no surprise. And thank you. Cheers. 24.2.193.216 (talk) 23:25, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Incidentally, I love a block evading account lecturing me on learning 'the Wikipedia rules.' 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 23:36, 20 October 2019 (UTC)