User talk:2601:18F:802:9690:1C68:B710:2AC0:A66A

September 2020
Hello, I'm AcebulfALT. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Irrational number—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. AcebulfALT (talk) 20:15, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Irrational number. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Blablubbs (talk • contribs) 20:21, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Irrational number, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Irrational number was changed by 2601:18F:802:9690:1C68:B710:2AC0:A66A (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.883159 on 2020-09-27T20:22:15+00:00 Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:22, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Your addition to Irrational number was clearly wrong: the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter (commonly denoted with PI) is irrational, but the number you added is not. Its decimal representation you pasted is finite, hence the value equals some (big) natural number divided by some (big) power of 10, which is a ratio of two natural numbers, hence by definition a rational number. --CiaPan (talk) 00:02, 30 September 2020 (UTC)