User talk:2601:18F:A00:9940:E82B:B400:A16C:E0FE

Dextroamphetamine dependence…
You said then what about methamphetamine? Really? Methamphetamine’s propensity for physical dependence isn’t “high” either... Who even told you that? Those cheesy “not even once” PSA’s from early 2000s or something? I’m shocked that anyone even mildly informed on such topics would still even believe that. I’m not one of those people that is suggesting stimulant drugs can’t form a physical dependence (which is a common myth even among the semi-“educated”); but to suggest its liability for  physical dependence should be considered high like its in the same league as heroin or alcohol or Xanax or something like those is nonsense. You really think there’s something so special about meth? Well there isn’t. Go research the basics of different drug classes and their pharmacology and other scientific profiles before you go throwing common misconceptions around like some kind of checkmate move, lol. If stimulants’ liability for physical dependence isn’t “medium“ then what is? There is low, medium, and high, so.. such a claim just raises more questions then answers, besides it just being flat out wrong and pharmacologically nonsensical. Since when have stimulants (literally any conceivable stimulant at all) ever had the same or similar level of physical dependence liability as hardcore depressant drugs? Have you really thought that this whole time or something? Dexedream (talk) 02:25, 9 May 2023 (UTC)