User talk:2601:1C0:4401:F60:E945:8986:3504:30CB

Your recent warning to an IP
Hi, Thank you for your contributions fighting vandalism. I saw that you immediately proceeded to give an IP a level 4im warning after one edit here. Just a friendly reminder that you should only give out level 4 or 4im warnings only if the IP has vandalized more than once and/or is a sockpuppet of another IP or user

Thanks 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 19:29, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I gave them a 4im warning because it seemed like they had jumped to that IP address from a different one, which was . Plus, the article itself has been prone to lots of vandalism as of late. 2601:1C0:4401:F60:E945:8986:3504:30CB (talk) 19:31, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I see. thank you for clarifying this issue. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 19:32, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
 * , I have no issue with an editor giving a level 4im warning for blatant BLP violations. There are a number of other scenarios other than the two you mention where a level 4 warning would not be inappropriate. I imagine there are a number of admins who feel the same. In addition, I'm not sure why you mention giving a sock a level 4im warning, we just block them. .-- Ponyo bons mots 19:36, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks for clarifying this. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 19:45, 19 July 2023 (UTC)