User talk:2601:1C0:4500:CE53:6163:6A9F:BC90:9B80

Note 5 refers to an article of a different title than the one cited. Nature 548, 135 (10 August 2017) doi:10.1038/548135b is titled "SI units need reform to avoid confusion". I was able to reach the article without a password: https://www.nature.com/news/si-units-need-reform-to-avoid-confusion-1.22417

The incorrect title also appears in Bunker's powerpoint slides cited and linked in the article.

While Mills makes some good points, I suggest citing a reasonable response to his 2016 paper: "Comment on 'On the units radian and cycle for the quantity plane angle'" by B. P. Leonard, IOP: Metrologia; volume 53, number 6 - 26 Oct 2016 (https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/53/6/1281) which is freely available.

Sorry if I did not follow protocol, I have not commented on an article in several years, if ever. Shokutaku (talk) 00:24, 22 October 2018 (UTC)