User talk:2601:1C1:8904:EA50:903:7F9C:6470:744F

October 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Happy Tree Friends (TV series) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:56, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Happy Tree Friends (TV series) was changed by 2601:1C1:8904:EA50:903:7F9C:6470:744F (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.930921 on 2020-10-22T20:56:16+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Happy Tree Friends (TV series). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 21:09, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Happy Tree Friends (TV series), you may be blocked from editing. Magitroopa (talk) 21:20, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
 * You're not getting it. I wanted the deaths parts to be removed, since it scars me and is bad for my mental health due to my fear of blood and gore, but why did you restore it like three times?
 * First, I did not restore it three times. The first time was an anti-vandalism bot. Secondly, you don't remove info just because you alone do not like it. If it's incorrect info or vandalism itself, then it's fine to remove. However, this is info that editors have taken time to add in. You can't just all of a sudden remove it because you've decided you don't like it. Finally, your entire edit history shows just how much vandalism/disruptive edits/edit warring you've done. You are constantly editing articles to the way you prefer it to be, seemingly ignoring what other editors have said. I know this because I am one of those editors. You are constantly adding unsourced info and removing content you don't want, and when your edits are reverted, you usually come back with a, "You're still not giving me a reason why you reverted it back to the previous edit." A reason is not always necessary for a revert, especially when the edits are clearly disruptive/vandalism. I highly suggest you change your editing styles, otherwise, you'll most likely soon be risking a block from editing. Magitroopa (talk) 21:41, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but I was just trying to remove the deaths parts, since it scars me and is bad for my mental health due to my fear of blood and gore.