User talk:2601:1C2:1A00:557:1117:E0F6:CD34:E790

October 2023
Hello, I'm Asparagusus. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Michael Harrington, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! —asparagusus  (interaction)  sprouts!  18:23, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Michael Harrington. Thank you. —asparagusus  (interaction)  sprouts!  18:26, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ... disco spinster   talk  18:29, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Michael Harrington shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —asparagusus  (interaction)  sprouts!  18:30, 7 October 2023 (UTC)


 * You violated this rule, though. 2601:1C2:1A00:557:1117:E0F6:CD34:E790 (talk) 21:25, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I did not perform more than 3 reverts. Also, per WP:3RRNO, reverting obvious violations of WP:BLP can be exempted from WP:3RR in some situations. —asparagusus   (interaction)  sprouts!  21:42, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Michael Harrington) for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. ... disco spinster   talk  18:31, 7 October 2023 (UTC)