User talk:2601:204:C700:99:5846:9660:C460:CF63

February 2024
Hello, I'm Chaotic Enby. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to The 1619 Project have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 17:56, 6 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Did not appear constructive? I'm not even sure what that means. Did anyone offer any specifics? The edits more accurately characterized the Wilentz et al. letter to NYT, which was supportive of the project's main goals, but critical of some of the particulars. The Wikipedia piece mentioned nothing about the historians' broad sympathy toward the project. 2601:204:C700:99:5846:9660:C460:CF63 (talk) 18:05, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
 * "Rebutted" adds a point of view, claiming that they were effective in proving the claim wrong, and isn't neutral. Chaotıċ Enby  (talk · contribs) 18:17, 6 February 2024 (UTC)