User talk:2601:240:D000:17E:21F:F3FF:FE44:E4C7

August 2016
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Sino-Soviet split, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 06:24, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2016
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Sino-Soviet split— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 08:40, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Non-free use
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to a page, specifically Other, may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:20, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi 2601:240:D000:17E:21F:F3FF:FE44:E4C7. The licensing of each image you see on Wikipedia is determined by it copyright status and not every image file you see on Wikipedia is licensed the same. Some files are licensed as public domain or licensed under a free licensed suitable for Wikipedia and these are often collectively referred to as "free images". Other files are licensed as non-free content because of their copyright status and these file are commonly referred to as "non-free images". Non-free image use is highly restricted and each use of such an an image must satisfy Wikipedia's non-free image use policy. One of these restrctions is WP:NFCC, which says that each use of non-free content needs to be provided with a separate and specific non-free use rationale. This I why have removed the non-free File:Derrida main.jpg and File:Edward Said.jpg from the article Other. If you feel that the non-free use of these files in that article can be justified and shown to satisfy all 10 non-free content criteria, then please provide the required non-free use rationale as explained in WP:NFCCE.
 * You should be aware, however, that although the non-free use of an image of a deceased individual may be allowed when the image is used as the primary means of identification in the stand-alone Wikipedia article about the said individual as explained in item 10 of WP:NFCI, the use in other articles, such as an "Others" requires a much stronger non-free justification than simply mentioning a person by their name or by discussing their theories; there is nothing written in the "Other" article about Said or Derrida which requires that the reader actually see what they look like to be understood per WP:NFC, so a link to their respective articles is more than sufficient per WP:FREER. Just for reference, previous discussions about similar images being used in a similar way have almost always resulted in a consensus of "remove" at WP:FFD. Please do not re-add the files to the article again without providing the appropariate non-free use rationale again becaue doing so is clearly in violation of relevant Wikipedia policy. If you have any questions about this, you can ask for help at WP:MCQ or WT:NFCC. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:37, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Operation Paperclip, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 03:46, 4 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Unless you can cite a reliable, verifiable, third party (neutral) source that shows that every one of these scientists were Nazi Party members or indistinguishable from Nazis, your edit is questionable and the more neutral term should remain. Helpful information about editing Wikipedia can be found on various Wikipedia guideline and policy pages including: Help:Getting started; Introduction; Simplified ruleset; Simplified Manual of Style; Referencing for beginners; Identifying reliable sources; Citing sources; Help:Footnotes; Verifiability; No original research; Neutral point of view; Notability; Biographies of living persons; What Wikipedia is not; Words to watch; Help:Introduction to talk pages; Copyright Problems and Help:Contents. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 03:48, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Welcome Suggestion
Hello and thank you for lending your time to help improve Wikipedia. If you are interested in editing more often, we suggest you create an account to gain additional privileges and continue participate in our WikiCommunity.