User talk:2601:244:4081:500:C91D:AF79:18C5:3E9C

Today's edits
I have reverted all of your edits today.
 * 1) I-94 and I-57 do not overlap, so editing the jct template to say "I-94/I-57" adds a falsehood into articles.
 * 2) I-94 does not overlap US 12 and US 20 at I-57's terminus, thus like #1, this is a falsehood that needs to be removed. No, they are not "close enough", and I-57 never actually intersects them before terminating, just I-94. This is not the same as the I-65 terminus where I-65 is shown as terminating at US 12/US 20 just past I-90.
 * 3) US 20's national article does not need another Illinois junction in its infobox, not when it meant removing the only Pennsylvania junction. I-57 and I-79 may have similar importances, but omitting a state on US 20's route breaks that tie in favor of I-79.
 * 4) US 12's national article does not need another Illinois junction in its infobox, not when it meant removing the only Wyoming junction junction. I-15 is a major cross-country Interstate, while I-57 is not, thus there isn't a tie for importance between them, especially when it also means omitting a junction for a state with just under 600 miles of US 12's length in favor of a second junction for a state with 85 miles of the total length.
 * 5) The road junction article doesn't need a second photo in that section. The aerial photo is more illustrative than a ground-level one, so for a second time, I removed the photo you added. Additionally, I had improved the linking in the caption; we normally don't link to common terms, and "United States" is considered common. I also bypassed the redirects so that if a reader hovers his or her cursor over the links, they'll get "Interstate 96" instead of "I-96", thus allowing those unfamiliar with American highway abbreviation conventions to get the full name, and that is A Good Thing™.

Regarding #5 specifically, and your edits across multiple IP addresses in general, you should follow WP:BRD. That stands for "Bold, Revert, Discuss". We encourage editors to be Bold with their editing and make changes they think will improve the articles. If someone else disagrees, you'll be Reverted, and then next step is to Discuss. If adding I-57 as a junction to an infobox is truly an improvement, you should be able to state a logical reason why. Otherwise, it looks like you just want to promote your favorite Interstate or overpromote your home metro area at the expense of listing other states.

As I have laid out, these are not improvements. Adding falsehoods to articles can be considered vandalism, thus I will remove them on sight now and in the future. Continuing to vandalize articles can result in the revocation of editing privileges, or the protection of articles to prevent anonymous edits to them.  Imzadi 1979  →   20:54, 29 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The edit to I-88 has been reverted because there is no CR 77 listed on the exit signage there. Please confine your revisions on exit lists to content reflected on signage.  Imzadi 1979  →   03:10, 30 January 2023 (UTC)