User talk:2601:244:8303:DF90:60BC:C78D:2B52:12BF

February 2024
Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Blonde on Blonde—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Philipnelson99 (talk) 21:11, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Blonde on Blonde. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 21:12, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Blonde on Blonde, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Blonde on Blonde was changed by 2601:244:8303:DF90:60BC:C78D:2B52:12BF (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950095 on 2024-02-16T21:13:18+00:00 Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:13, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Blonde on Blonde. Philipnelson99 (talk) 21:14, 16 February 2024 (UTC)