User talk:2601:249:A00:7090:D8A:FF44:4348:D3F1

Excessive LUCA discussion in the Abiogenesis article
Hi, could you please stop trying to force additional materials on LUCA into the Abiogenesis article. The article necessarily contains only a brief summary of the LUCA article; it is definitely not the place for "new" materials, especially not if they are controversial. If the LUCA article changes are sufficient to merit alterations to the summary at the top of the LUCA article, then it might be appropriate to make small concomitant changes over at Abiogenesis: or perhaps not. What we should not be doing is spamming "new" materials across two or more articles; that sort of behaviour is unacceptable and disruptive. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:12, 19 September 2022 (UTC)