User talk:2601:444:380:3A90:51A4:C47E:169E:3F95

The material you added is NOT REFERENCED. Also, don't remove referenced material. Before you edit, you should read:

In particular:
 * Verifiability
 * No original research
 * SECONDARY.

Thank you for reading this. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 23:18, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I've now linked the endgame tablebase.--2601:444:380:3A90:51A4:C47E:169E:3F95 (talk) 00:01, 26 May 2019 (UTC)


 * That is clearly insufficient. Please read:


 * Verifiability
 * No original research
 * SECONDARY. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 03:53, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

normal positions
"doubled pawns (except rook pawns) win in all normal circumstances". You are very unlikely to get into doubled pawns on adjacent ranks in a NORMAL position. That probably means that you advanced the pawn on the lower rank, which would usually be a mistake. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 23:24, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
 * "Normal" is a weasel word (anything that's not illegal is potentially "normal" in chess); what are the criteria for "normal"? I.e., zugzwang may compel capture into a drawn position otherwise easily avoided -- that's a very normal way to achieve a stalemate.--2601:444:380:3A90:51A4:C47E:169E:3F95 (talk) 00:01, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * "normal" is not a weasel word, it's the word the source uses. It seems to be an accurate characterization. Quale (talk) 03:02, 26 May 2019 (UTC)