User talk:2601:600:8281:97C0:9426:C1EF:8EFC:99B5

January 2024
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Monat. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Cahk (talk) 08:50, 25 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Please point out where these still reside. I revised the entire page (which now looks undone?) to edit away any personal analysis or personal point of view. If I missed a spot please let me know, I'm happy to edit. 2601:600:8281:97C0:9426:C1EF:8EFC:99B5 (talk) 08:54, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Monat, you may be blocked from editing. Cahk (talk) 09:04, 25 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Did you see my last response to you? Or read any of my edits? I added over 40 citations and updated information and facts to the page! The way it currently is is very outdated. 2601:600:8281:97C0:9426:C1EF:8EFC:99B5 (talk) 09:15, 25 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Yes, what I've seen is you are trying to get rid of the MLM label, use press releases as sources, add meaningless "facts" and "awards", and generally rewrite the page so it looks like it came from a marketing department. It's all unacceptable. tedder (talk) 16:08, 25 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi sir. The industry is Direct Sales, "MLM" is not an industry it is a company structure. Happy to not use the awards section if you don't see fit. As a former government research scientist I'm well aware of what makes a legitimate citation. I'm sure in your role you are too! And if you read through the history, science, legal sections etc. you'll easily see that its currently extremely outdated (and many of the current "sources" are from old articles written on untrustworthy sources - to your exact point that its unacceptable). Happy to discuss further details, but leaving out pertinent info like which countries are currently a part of the company, or information on CEOs, current partnerships the company has made in recent years, etc. would mean you're purposefully not doing your job and keeping facts away from the public - right? I appreciate you taking a closer look into my edits. 2601:600:8281:97C0:48E5:D056:E6F2:86E5 (talk) 05:02, 27 January 2024 (UTC)