User talk:2601:600:8F00:5500:D163:1D1A:3177:363F

April 2024
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to List of generation I Pokémon, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you.  cogsan (nag me)  (stalk me) 22:48, 12 April 2024 (UTC)


 * for clarity's sake, this is for more or less the exact same reason bulbapedia has to use "may be" to describe pokémon's seemingly obvious origins, as those aren't actually confirmed by game freak or ken sugimori or anyone else... ever, really
 * unless sources can be found that elaborate on their origins, in which case the idea would be Cool, and even Neato  cogsan (nag me)  (stalk me) 22:54, 12 April 2024 (UTC)