User talk:2601:640:8001:6938:7D42:7D47:9300:9A13

In regards to the phrase, "It requires governmental searches and seizures to be conducted only upon issuance of a warrant..." this is not accurate. The 4th amendment protects us against unreasonable searches and seizures and it explains what is required for a warrant to be issued. It does not say that one is required. The Supreme court has said that a warrant is preferred and they take the view that a search is considered unreasonable without a warrant, but then they go on to allow searches without warrants under several circumstances, incident to arrest being one example.

This article would better serve the public if people understood that the warrant requirement is not absolute. It might prevent someone from resisting a lawful search where that resistance might result in additional charges being brought and perhapsthe party being found guilty by the courts.