User talk:2601:645:4000:C180:695E:204B:656:EA75

August 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at German Shepherd. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  City O f  Silver  00:50, 1 August 2023 (UTC)


 * I can’t quite understand why my edit would be deemed as unconstructive, not to mention appear to constitute vandalism. I only edited the section that mentioned Blondi, Adolf Hitler’s dog, which, in my opinion, was lacking important information.
 * I have spent a lot of time doing extensive research on the topics of Adolf Hitler and the Third Reich, and I would certainly like to consider myself as someone who has a lot of knowledge about the aforementioned topics. The edit that I made to the article contained only information that is 100% factual, based on extensive research, and, most importantly, can be proven to be true using many different sources, such as both web and physical articles on the topic, witness testimonies, books about Adolf Hitler. I didn’t use offensive language, nor did I promote Nazizm/Adolf Hitler’s political views and/or beliefs.
 * I’d really appreciate an explanation as to why the edit I made was reverted to the original version (that’s lacking information), and why it was considered to be unconstructive and vandalizing in the first place. 2601:645:4000:C180:695E:204B:656:EA75 (talk) 01:42, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
 * You added worshipful text ("beloved dog with whom he had, reportedly, shared an exceptionally strong bond") about effing Hitler and failed to provide a scintilla of evidence supporting your change. See WP:NONAZIS and step lively any time you want to add anything, literally one single word, that could be construed as remotely positive about that guy.  City O f  Silver  02:01, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Stating that Hitler liked his dog and had formed a bond with it, does not, in any way, make the statement “worshipful.” It’s a fact, and I don’t see how anyone could interpret it as me “worshipping” Hitler. You can be a bad person and still like your dog, man.
 * I have many links, quotes, etc. that prove my statement—I had no idea I had to provide them with the edit, considering how little acknowledging the man’s relationship with his dog changed. It only provided insightful information, it didn’t magically make Hitler’s crimes disappear, or make him a better person. And if just stating facts is suddenly considered Pro-Nazi, then there’s definitely something wrong here. 2601:645:4000:C180:695E:204B:656:EA75 (talk) 02:50, 1 August 2023 (UTC)