User talk:2601:645:4300:4E20:BCE9:A049:B82:9059

December 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. Editors are expected to treat each other with respect and civility. On this encyclopedia project, editors assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not appear to do at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deanna Lynn Wulff. Here is Wikipedia's welcome page, and it is hoped that you will assume the good faith of other editors and continue to help us improve Wikipedia! Thank you very much! Hey man im josh (talk) 16:28, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deanna Lynn Wulff. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. ''Stop adding text to the nominator's rationale and do not threaten to have a page deleted. The AfD is not violating any policies at this point in time.'' Hey man im josh (talk) 16:48, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, as you did at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard, you may be blocked from editing. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:03, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Deanna Lynn Wulff shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Do not continue to remove the autobiography and COI tags on an article that is an autobiography or you may be blocked. Reywas92Talk 17:50, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Talk page comments
You must place your own comments at the end of discussion, and preferably sign them (normally using four tildes: ). You may not put your words over someone else's signature or otherwise change their comments, this makes it appear that they have written things which they have not. MrOllie (talk) 17:56, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
 You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Deanna Lynn Wulff) for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:24, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Civility and assuming good faith
Wikipedia has several policies and guidelines about civility and the assumption of good faith, which we take seriously here. You are egregiously violating them with your comments in Articles for deletion/Deanna Lynn Wulff. Please try to adapt your discourse to the customs of a new place. And please read the guidelines I have linked for you. Also, you have an account, so please always log in to edit. Since you haven't used the account for years, I'm putting this advice also on your most recently used IPs' talkpages. I hope it reaches you; IPs fluctuate (which is a good reason to use your account) but I'm doing my best to contact you. Bishonen &#124; tålk 23:13, 18 December 2022 (UTC).