User talk:2601:645:C001:4A40:8C42:D63B:8702:D99F

April 2021
Hello, I'm Ferien. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to San Francisco Board of Education seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Ferien (talk) 15:55, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

I've been adding numerous variety of news sources not only today but several past days to this article. Before you respond with an honest first reaction, take some time to review the full article and the number of sources that represent a variety of political leanings. I'm confident you'll discover that they all arrive at the same description, hence a consensus.

That is why I undid your undo. Appreciate your veteran status an editor, but I think to really make sure your statement is correct, I suggest you take a closer look. Even veterans editors can make mistakes. Regards, 2601:645:C001:4A40:8C42:D63B:8702:D99F (talk) 16:11, 21 April 2021 (UTC)


 * My status as a "veteran editor" does not matter, yes. Although I would not call myself a veteran editor, all editors should be treated the same and should be held as responsible for their mistakes as others. Sorry for reverting all those edits. I should have taken a closer look at it and then only reverted some of it. And, I read this COMPLETELY wrong "The response to the apology has not been good.", I thought it said the apology has not been good. My apologies, I have made a mistake here. Regards, --Ferien (talk) 16:14, 21 April 2021 (UTC)


 * My respect for you grows even more by your willingness to apologize for an honest mistake. As they say in the United States, "good looking out".  Vielen danke, freund! Regards, 2601:645:C001:4A40:8C42:D63B:8702:D99F (talk) 16:20, 21 April 2021 (UTC)


 * To be fair, I think you still have a pending good point I need to fix, and maybe that is why you had trouble following that particular part of the section. I am rereading the paragraph right now.  The order of the sentences does not flow, like "non sequitur", and invites confusion by the order of each sentence.  I will have to reorder sentences at the very least to make it not so confusing. Regards, 2601:645:C001:4A40:8C42:D63B:8702:D99F (talk) 16:25, 21 April 2021 (UTC)