User talk:2601:645:C001:4A40:F8E8:39A6:41AC:ECEA

The facts added as edits are not "sins" as BriefEdits accuses.

The edits are accurate and objective.

On leads
I reviewed the topic Leadlength as BriefEdits mentioned as reason to edit as an undo:

"Length Shortcut MOS:LEADLENGTH The appropriate length of the lead section depends on the total length of the article. As a general guideline—but not absolute rule—the lead should usually be no longer than four paragraphs. The length of the lead should conform to readers' expectations of a short, but useful and complete, summary of the topic. A lead that is too short leaves the reader unsatisfied; a lead that is too long is intimidating, difficult to read, and may cause the reader to lose interest halfway."

What is important to note is that it is written that

"As a general guideline—but not absolute rule—the lead should usually be no longer than four paragraphs."

General guideline - not black and white rule.

It also written "The length of the lead should conform to readers' expectations of a short, but useful and complete, summary of the topic. A lead that is too short leaves the reader unsatisfied; a lead that is too long is intimidating, difficult to read, and may cause the reader to lose interest halfway."

The addition to the lead I made as an edit I say DOES conform to readers' expectations of a short, but useful and complete, summary of the topic.

Furthermore it is written "Length Shortcut MOS:LEADLENGTH The appropriate length of the lead section depends on the total length of the article. As a general guideline—but not absolute rule—the lead should usually be no longer than four paragraphs. The length of the lead should conform to readers' expectations of a short, but useful and complete, summary of the topic. A lead that is too short leaves the reader unsatisfied; a lead that is too long is intimidating, difficult to read, and may cause the reader to lose interest halfway. The following suggestions about lead length may be useful ("article length" refers to readable prose size):

Article length	Lead length Fewer than 15,000 characters	One or two paragraphs 15,000–30,000 characters	Two or three paragraphs More than 30,000 characters	Three or four paragraphs "

The leadlength still remains about two paragraphs - the paragraphs have been edited with added content, with more precision and clarity, and thusly with less ambiguity.

Inspect the lead now - It is really only two paragraphs:

"Alison M. Collins is a community activist[1] and a former educator.[2] Collins has served as one of seven elected commissioners on the San Francisco Board of Education since January 7, 2019.[3]

As a commissioner on the board, Collins has increasingly been criticized by her constituents and by the Mayor of San Francisco London Breed, during the COVID-19 pandemic in San Francisco when schools district-wide had to close, and when all in-person instruction had to be replaced by online instruction. There have been five notable incidents since 2020 Collins has received increasing criticism: 1.Not allowing adequate verification of historical facts by historians and not allowing discussion with her constituents before choosing to vote to rename 44 schools in the San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD) which allegedly honor individuals with discriminatory pasts[4]. 2.Not prioritizing appropriate time and effort at each Board meeting to discuss a plan on when and how to resume in-person instruction and school reopening during the COVID-19 pandemic in the San Francisco Bay Area.[5][6] 3.Not allowing appropriate time at Board meetings for constituents to voice their opinions, before voting to permanently end merit-based admission policy at Lowell High School. 4.Not denouncing unequivocally racist remarks Collins tweeted in 2016, including calling Asians "house n****r" and "the help" (both racial slurs), in a series of tweets she wrote in 2016 and continued to remain visible in her Twitter account to the present day despite near universal condemnation by her constituents and elected leaders when the tweets were publicized on March 19, 2021 by supporters of an effort to recall her. [7][8] Collins's actions not to issue an apology to Asian-Americans after the tweets became public, led to Collins being stripped of her title as Vice-President of the Board on March 25, 2021, in a vote of no confidence, five of seven commissioners voted in favor - only Commissioners Lopez and Collins opposed.[9] 5.Filing an $87 million lawsuit on March 31, 2021 against the school district (which was already cash-strapped due to the pandemic) and against all five board members who voted in favor of a motion of no confidence against Collins. Since February 2021, an effort to recall Collins continues to gain support. Many San Francisco leaders and constituents have since called for Collins's resignation after her tweets containing racist remarks were resurfaced on March 19, 2021."

In reality, the lead is not too long, it is in line with the recommendations Wikipedia says for length of lead in. It is just two paragraphs.

added content is NPOV - in other words neutral
The added content is well supported by content written in other sections of the article and cited sources.

Thusly, the claim by BriefEdits that the added content is violates NPOV is non supported. Consequently, I have reversed his last edit.