User talk:2601:646:4000:7740:E955:991A:41:E627

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you. Southern Lights (talk) 21:09, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Do not use multiple IP addresses to disrupt Wikipedia, like you did at Cathedral School for Boys. Such attempts to avoid detection or circumvent the blocking policy will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia '''you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''' Meters (talk) 01:37, 4 June 2020 (UTC)