User talk:2601:646:8E01:7E0B:F88D:DE34:7772:8E5B

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions&#32;so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply  [ create a named account] . It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages and rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (2601:646:8E01:7E0B:F88D:DE34:7772:8E5B) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a new Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;).

Happy editing! FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  00:57, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Wikipedia:Reference desk/Miscellaneous. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 00:14, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Reference desk/Miscellaneous. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 16:45, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * Also, read WP:Identifying reliable sources. Wikipedia by and large goes with mainstream media, regardless of your opinion of them.  Ian.thomson (talk) 16:45, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
 * If the mainstream media is a reliable source, then I am Sean Connery! In fact, I can give dozens (if not hundreds) of examples where the mainstream media has either been flagrantly and inexcusably wrong regarding the facts, deliberately biased in their analysis thereof, or even outright lying to serve their unstated political agenda! 2601:646:8E01:7E0B:F88D:DE34:7772:8E5B (talk) 02:25, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * If you do not accept that Wikipedia considers mainstream sources as reliable, then you do not belong here. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:33, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * If YOU consider it acceptable to cite as a reliable source a lying rag which even claimed that Hillary won this year's election, then YOU don't belong here! 2601:646:8E01:7E0B:F88D:DE34:7772:8E5B (talk) 02:39, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * And BTW, given your self-proclaimed political bias on your user page, you have no more standing to tell truth from fiction than anyone else! 2601:646:8E01:7E0B:F88D:DE34:7772:8E5B (talk) 02:42, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * See WP:Identifying reliable sources, WP:FRINGE, WP:No original research, WP:Assume good faith, and WP:TRUTH. Wikipedia is based on summaries of mainstream sources, your political beliefs do not matter.  The community does not accept those who rejects mainstream sources.  Ian.thomson (talk) 02:45, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * In this case, the entire community is itself guilty of POV pushing along with the mainstream media! Because the mainstream media lies all the time, and there is ABUNDANT proof of this! 2601:646:8E01:7E0B:F88D:DE34:7772:8E5B (talk) 02:49, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

If all the traffic is coming your way, you're probably in the wrong lane. Ian.thomson (talk) 03:04, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Just because most people believe it doesn't make it true, as evidenced e.g. by the flat-earth theory! 2601:646:8E01:7E0B:F88D:DE34:7772:8E5B (talk) 03:07, 5 December 2016 (UTC)