User talk:2601:647:5800:1A1F:44FA:DE9D:609D:CDBA

Edits at Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Workshop
Welcome to Wikipedia. I notice your first edit was to an arbitration case page. Please note that such edits are not permitted except on your main account (or a disclosed alternate account), per WP:PROJSOCK. I have collapsed your Workshop section pending disclosure of any main account or other suitable explanation. Apologies for the inconvenience. Best, KevinL ( aka L235 · t · c) 19:24, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
 * User:L235, I do not own any other accounts, but just edit occasionally when I feel like it. However, I lurk a lot on Wikipedia, and sometimes follow Arbitration cases. I just edited here because I wanted to help contribute to the Arbcom case and make sure that I, as an uninvolved editor, could help Arbcom come to a fair decision. I understand you may be nervous given the regular disruption by new editors at Arbcom cases. Rest assured that I am not here to disrupt the arbitration case. Regards 2601:647:5800:1A1F:44FA:DE9D:609D:CDBA (talk) 19:30, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Would it be possible for you to list your prior IPs, if you have those available, or otherwise describe the kind and quantity of your prior contributions as a (distant) next-best choice? Please understand that ArbCom cases are very frequent targets of disruption and PROJSOCK exists to prevent giving an undue advantage to those who would deceive in order to achieve their preferred outcomes. Best, KevinL ( aka L235 · t · c) 19:33, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
 * User:L235 Due to various privacy reasons, I will not be disclosing my previous IP addresses. However, my contributions generally tend to be sporadic and go where I am interested most. I edited COVID articles in March 2020, edited on ClueBot NG's praise section in 2021, and was reverting disruptive edits just yesterday. However, I did disrupt the encyclopedia back in October 2018, but I was more of a new editor back then. After two warnings, I stopped. None of my previous IP addresses have edited Arbcom cases. That's probably all I can share without revealing too much about myself. 2601:647:5800:1A1F:44FA:DE9D:609D:CDBA (talk) 20:22, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Okay, here's one: User:2601:647:5800:1A1F:205F:23AB:CD66:1EDD 2601:647:5800:1A1F:44FA:DE9D:609D:CDBA (talk) 20:44, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Hi User:L235. I have disclosed one of my IP addresses above. If you're busy, I'll ping another drafting arbitrator to take a look. 2601:647:5800:1A1F:44FA:DE9D:609D:CDBA (talk) 22:12, 6 February 2022 (UTC) Looks like you are busy. Pinging the other drafting arbitrators. 2601:647:5800:1A1F:44FA:DE9D:609D:CDBA (talk) 23:13, 6 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Pings don't work unless you also sign your comment in the same edit. This means the above arbitrators didn't get your ping, but I think they are now aware of your reply. Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 01:29, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks Dreamy Jazz. I hope we can clarify this issue and put things to rest. 2601:647:5800:1A1F:44FA:DE9D:609D:CDBA (talk) 01:33, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Attempting ping again. Let's try to get this resolved as quickly as possible 2601:647:5800:1A1F:44FA:DE9D:609D:CDBA (talk) 01:36, 7 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi - I'm going to uncollapse your section with the understanding that arbitrators and clerks reserve the right to ask you later to make submissions only by email if our decision changes or if any disruptive activity occurs. Best, KevinL ( aka L235 · t · c) 02:40, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I think I'll leave it to the arbitrators at this stage, since I don't plan to comment more on the workshop page. I'll go back to lurking around, as usual. Also, anonymous accounts can't use email. I'm glad to have been WP:BOLD and potentially helped the case. 2601:647:5800:1A1F:44FA:DE9D:609D:CDBA (talk) 02:44, 7 February 2022 (UTC)