User talk:2601:647:5800:9020:195A:5BB9:12D7:9878

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yaron Singer (September 5)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AviationFreak was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yaron Singer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yaron Singer, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Yaron_Singer Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AviationFreak&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Yaron_Singer reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AviationFreak 💬 04:24, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Yaron Singer has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission:

'''The above review needs some further explanation. Notability as a scientist depends upon the guideline WP:PROF, not WP:GNG. Notability is not shown under this guideline by third party sources discussing his work, but by the criteria in WP:PROF. The usual criterion here is being influential in one's subject, as shown by demonstrating the influence of the person's work within their subject. This is turn is usually determined by the citations to the person's peer-reviewed journal papers (or, in some branches of engineering, including the field of computer science, peer-reviewed conference presentations). (It is also of course possible for a scientist to be notable in other ways, and then GNG can apply, but it seems that WP:PROF is the most likely provision here.)'''

'''Therefore, it is very relevant indeed to give the person's papers--indeed, it's essential. It is now necessary to find the citations to his most cited papers (the usual source here is Google Scholar), and add them. Only after this is done can notability be determined. Additional comments or references from thrid parties about his work are helpful, but not required. A source is needed for bio data, and the official CV is sufficient. '''

'''Please list the five or so most cited publications with citation figures, and resubmit. let me know personally on my user talk age when you have done so. I will then judge if it is sufficient for the standard.'''  DGG ( talk ) 08:27, 5 September 2020 (UTC)