User talk:2601:680:C601:56E0:14CC:8009:7BBC:8AD1

October 2022
Hello, I'm LilianaUwU. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Scott Menville, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Liliana UwU (talk / contribs) 03:13, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:29, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Alan Tudyk, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Aoidh (talk) 03:55, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:15, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, as you did with this edit to Ed Begley Jr.. lavender &#124;(formerly HMSSolent )&#124; lambast 04:57, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. FMSky (talk) 05:56, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Scott Menville. Fragrant Peony (talk) 06:02, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

About your recent edits
I'm not going to bother with a generic template, but I want to explain why your edits have been reverted. For articles, especially articles about living people, you need to verify what you put there with reliable sources. Your edits have not done that, so they have been reverted, and I want to make that point very clear: you have been adding content for about 4 hours now, and not a single thing you have added is still on any of the articles you have edited, that has all been for nothing. In fact on an article like Scott Menville, the content you add won't even show up until it's been approved, even if nobody reverts it. Unless you add a reliable source with the information you're adding, you're not going to see any of the content you add remain on any article. - Aoidh (talk) 06:09, 1 October 2022 (UTC)