User talk:2601:681:4102:B0C0:1CBC:652E:93BC:37CB

Hearsay/Proof
Please help me with...

where is the proof, just because a person interprets the call one way, that does not proof that the way another intercepts it is wrong. That is hearsay! The democrats read into the call what they want. That is not proof!!! According to an article written about the House, the Founding Fathers felt that Senators were more intelligent & therefore given more power to judge the accusations of the House. That is true in this case, but there is proof that the House has gone rogue. Opinion yes, proof, opinion. Hearsay-end Paula Stout
 * This does not seem pertinent to Wikipedia or a Wikipedia article; if it is, please comment on the talk page of the article. 331dot (talk) 02:01, 15 December 2019 (UTC)