User talk:2601:800:4001:EAF0:2A03:507F:55AC:1A3E

September 2023
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Homestead High School (Indiana), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. (bojo) (they/them)  (talk)  16:53, 17 September 2023 (UTC)


 * I have adapted it to a NPOV 2601:800:4001:EAF0:2A03:507F:55AC:1A3E (talk) 17:10, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

New message from Bojo1498
(bojo) (they/them)  (talk)  17:06, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Homestead High School (Indiana)
Hi, I've reversed your changes on this article for a few reasons: Dawnseeker2000 18:34, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) You changed a value in the infobox without updating its source. That causes a text-source issue (because they're no longer aligned). WP:INTEGRITY
 * 2) A change you made broke an image in the sense that it no longer displayed at all
 * 3) Is the content you're adding encyclopedic or is it more of a news story? The sources you've chosen might indicate the latter.


 * In good faith...
 * The information was actually what was not aligned with the source. The source was updated to the 22-23 year, not "21-21" as edited. I was merely updating it, actually upholding WP: Integrity.
 * How so? What is a proper remedy? Also, a proper response would be to revert the image in question, not a whole edit, correct?
 * I will now work to make it read in an encyclopedic manner, although I believe that was well taken care of given @Bojo1498's concerns. Additionally, what might be the appropriate sources for a encyclopedic entry? I believe WP: Reliable Sources states quite the opposite of your assertion. I see no reason why citations based on credible news organizations are invalid in any way and I beg you to answer why.
 * Also, this is my main account. I was strangely signed out. MK882 (talk) 23:33, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I'd also like to add that most of the sources were used in the Foundation Against Intolerance and Racism's article itself. MK882 (talk) 23:43, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Newly edited bylines have been adapted to an encyclopedic tone. I also believe there is no problem with the image or the image source as it has been properly uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. MK882 (talk) 23:49, 17 September 2023 (UTC)